What Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Really Means

By Shanti McGinley

This opinion paper was originally posted as a downloadable PDF on my website’s resources page. I am slowly formatting the articles over there for posting to this blog. This post was authored in mid- 2011. Download the original PDF here.

***

What Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Really Means

Q: It is surprising to me that you find it reasonable to pass on non-evidence based ideas. I don’t think this meets a best practice standard at all. I’m curious to know how you demonstrate efficacy this way.

The term “Evidence-Based Practice” has been bandied about and distorted. EBP does not mean that we only use methods that have been researched in a laboratory.

For example, have you ever used a mirror in therapy to help a client understand how to position the articulators for a speech sound? I hope so. Is there any evidence to support this idea? No. Does that mean that we can no longer use a mirror in therapy? I hope not.

In an Evidence-Based Practice, the SLP takes what has been demonstrated in laboratory research, and puts that together with what she has learned through direct clinical experience, and what the client needs/wants/prefers. Here are four sources of this idea:

1. According to ASHA, an evidence-based practice is one that integrates evidence from the LAB, from the CLINIC, and from the CLIENT himself. ASHA’s logo for the EBP is a triangle, with each side of the triangle representing one of these ideas. You can view this on the ASHA website and here, to the right.

2. Sacket et al, the original authors of the EBP, have stated in their textbook, “External clinical evidence [i.e., research] can inform, but can never replace, individual clinical expertise.” Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, p. 3-4). They insisted that laboratory evidence alone can never dominate ones decisions about therapy. [Sacket, D., & Richardson, W.S., & Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R.B. (1997) Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, p. 3-4]

3. Laura Justice, editor of the American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, contrasts EBP with “empirically validated treatments” (a treatment that has been validated by empirical research). She wrote: “…one’s use of an empirically validated treatment is not the same as engaging in EBP” (p. 324). Using EBP, the clinician “systematically gathers and integrates information (i.e., evidence) from a variety of resources, including scientific evidence [LAB], prior knowledge [CLINIC], and client preferences [CLIENT], to arrive at a decision” (p. 324). [Justice, Laura (2008) “Evidence-Based Terminology” Laura, Editor, AJSLP, 17, 4, November 2008]

4. Carol Dollaghan says that and EBP is the conscientious, explicit, and judicious integration of best available: External evidence from systematic research (LAB), Internal evidence from clinical practice (CLINIC), Evidence concerning the preferences of a fully-informed patient (CLIENT). [Dollaghan, C. A. (2007) The handbook for evidence-based practice in communication disorders. Baltimore: Brook.

0 thoughts on “What Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Really Means”

  1. Pam, thank you for helping to spread the word about what EBP actually consists of. Somehow the distortion that research alone defines EBP continues to grow. All if us of kindred spirit need to add our voices to emphasize the value of the clinician and the importance of the client’s values and insight. I just today had a 16 year old clients explain to me what was going on with her acquired reading problem in a way that helped my formative assessment clinically enhance her treatment program and independent practice regimen.

Leave a comment!

Keep the conversation going! Your email address will not be published.

*